Repository navigation
Add AI Agent Tools - #4396
Add AI Agent Tools#4396michielhdoteth wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
|
unicorn |
|
I want to make an AI agent on my site also |
|
The readme's one-line description is "The most comprehensive open-source library of AI agent components." The guidelines ask for an objective description of the theme rather than a tagline, and "most comprehensive" is a claim, not a description. Worth rewriting to say what the list actually covers. Second, the scope is very broad. Skills, MCPs, Agent Loops, Subagents, Hooks, Plugins, Prompts and Tools are eight fairly different artifact types sitting in one list. Together they read closer to "things that plug into AI coding assistants" than one coherent theme. Last one: "What Makes This Different" and the Star History section are about the repo itself rather than the tools in it. I'd cut both and let the entries carry the list. |
|
💯🎉💥🔥⚡✨ |
|
Good job |
|
all are be don nothing wow aming work brother |
|
|
Hi @sindresorhus, quick follow-up on this PR. The current revision keeps the entry focused on installable components and machine-readable catalogs, and the lint check is green. Is there anything else you would like me to change? If it is ready for review, could you share an update on timing when convenient? Thanks. |
|
Hello |
|
Checked the latest revision. On top of what CastelDazur said: there are no actual entries in the readme, only counts per category ("Development: 35", "Productivity: 18"). So you can't get to any of the tools from the list itself. Quick Stats I'd drop too, same as Star History. And quite a lot of badges at the top. |
|
Thanks @sbarkalov, that's fair on all three, and thanks for taking the time to look properly. All fixed in the repo the entry points at: Entries are now listed. Each of the eight categories renders its top entries with name, description, and source link, plus a link to the full catalog. I kept the root readme to a top 5 per category, one entry per source repo, rather than listing everything, so it stays readable instead of growing into a wall as entries get added. The complete tables live in each folder's README. Quick Stats is gone. So is Star History, and "What Makes This Different", which @CastelDazur flagged earlier for the same reason: those sections were about the repo rather than the tools in it. Badges cut from 10 to 2 (Awesome + Stars). @CastelDazur's other two points are addressed as well. The "most comprehensive" tagline is replaced with an objective description of what the list covers, and the theme is stated plainly rather than left for eight artifact types to imply. One thing worth flagging, since it bears on whether this belongs here: auditing the links turned up entries that had quietly rotted. Dead links, archived repos, and renamed repos, including several entries pointing at a single repository that never existed. Those are fixed or removed, and every remaining entry now resolves to a live repository. The readme is the accurate view of the list. |
|
Help me out |
|
Verry good |
|
Guideline review, since reviewers here review each other's PRs: Compliant: title case, One concrete issue: the description — "Installable components for AI coding assistants with machine-readable catalogs for programmatic discovery" — pitches the differentiator rather than describing the topic. The guidelines ask for an objective description of what the list curates. Something like "Skills, MCP servers, agent workflows, subagents, hooks, plugins, prompts, and CLI tools for AI coding assistants." says what a reader will find; "machine-readable catalogs for programmatic discovery" is a feature of the packaging, not the content. Worth double-checking: scope overlap with the existing AI entries in this section (several cover agents/coding assistants). A sentence in the PR body on how this differs from them would speed up review. |
|
Thanks @kevincouton for the clear review. Addressed: I updated the entry to describe the curated components directly, and the PR body clarifies that this is a cross-platform catalog rather than a single product or vendor-scoped list. The fix is pushed to the PR branch. |
|
|
Hi Everyone |
soundwaves927-glitch
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- AGI & CoCoSci - The reciprocation of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and Computational Cognitive Sciences (CoCoSci).
|
💯💯💯 |
|
😁On Oct 22, 2026 7:17 PM, chatprivatelyelonmusk-ai ***@***.***> wrote:chatprivatelyelonmusk-ai left a comment (sindresorhus/awesome#4396)
💯💯💯
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.Triage notifications, keep track of coding agent tasks and review pull requests on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS and Android. Download it today!
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
نعم ابو حازم |
|
choudaryalihasnainlona-134
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All data back up and configuration solved

https://github.com/michielhdoteth/awesome-ai-agent-tools#readme
Installable components for AI coding assistants: skills, MCP servers, agent workflows, subagents, hooks, plugins, prompts, and CLI tools, each with a source link and an install command. Every category ships a machine-readable catalog.json so agents can query it directly.
Existing agent entries here are single products or vendor-scoped lists. This one is cross-platform, and every entry resolves to a live repository. Added at the bottom of Artificial Intelligence.
Reviews:
Requirements
Add Name of List.#readmeURL.awesome-lintpasses.main.Contents, Awesome badge, appropriate license, and contribution guidelines.awesome-listandawesometopics.The required
unicornconfirmation has also been posted in the PR comments.