22 equal temperament
This article needs more citations. (February 2026) |
In music, 22 equal temperament, called 22-TET, 22-EDO, or 22-ET, is the tempered scale derived by dividing the octave into 22 equal steps (equal frequency ratios). â Each step represents a frequency ratio of 22â2, or 54.55 cents (â).
When composing with 22-ET, one needs to take into account a variety of considerations. Considering the 5-limit, there is a difference between 3 fifths and the sum of 1 fourth and 1 major third. It means that, starting from C, there are two A'sâone 16 steps and one 17 steps away. There is also a difference between a major tone and a minor tone. In C major, the second note (D) will be 4 steps away. However, in A minor, where A is 6 steps below C, the fourth note (D) will be 9 steps above A, so 3 steps above C. So when switching from C major to A minor, one needs to slightly change the D note. These discrepancies arise because, unlike 12-ET, 22-ET does not temper out the syntonic comma of 81/80,[1] but instead exaggerates its size by mapping it to one step.
In the 7-limit, the septimal minor seventh (7/4) can be distinguished from the sum of a fifth (3/2) and a minor third (6/5), and the septimal subminor third (7/6) is different from the minor third (6/5). This mapping tempers out the septimal comma of 64/63, which allows 22-ET to function as a "Superpythagorean" system where four stacked fifths are equated with the septimal major third (9/7) rather than the usual pental third of 5/4. This system is a "mirror image" of septimal meantone in many ways: meantone systems tune the fifth flat so that intervals of 5 are simple while intervals of 7 are complex, superpythagorean systems have the fifth tuned sharp so that intervals of 7 are simple while intervals of 5 are complex. The enharmonic structure is also reversed: sharps are sharper than flats, similar to Pythagorean tuning (and by extension 53 equal temperament), but to a greater degree.
Finally, 22-ET has a good approximation of the 11th harmonic, and is in fact the smallest equal temperament to be consistent in the 11-limit.
The net effect is that 22-ET allows (and to some extent even forces) the exploration of new musical territory, while still having excellent approximations of common practice consonances.
History and use
[edit]The idea of dividing the octave into 22 steps of equal size seems to have originated with nineteenth-century music theorist RHM Bosanquet. Inspired by the use of a 22-tone unequal division of the octave in the music theory of India, Bosanquet noted that a 22-tone equal division was capable of representing 5-limit music with tolerable accuracy.[2] In this he was followed in the twentieth century by theorist JosĂŠ WĂźrschmidt, who noted it as a possible next step after 19 equal temperament, and J. Murray Barbour in his survey of tuning history, Tuning and Temperament.[3] Contemporary advocates of 22 equal temperament include music theorist Paul Erlich and electronic music composer Sevish.
Notation
[edit]

22-EDO can be notated several ways. The first, Ups And Downs Notation,[4] uses up and down arrows, written as a caret and a lower-case "v", usually in a sans-serif font. One arrow equals one edostep. In note names, the arrows come first, to facilitate chord naming. This yields the following chromatic scale:
C, ^C/Dâ, vCâŻ/^Dâ, CâŻ/vD,
D, ^D/Eâ, vDâŻ/^Eâ, DâŻ/vE, E,
F, ^F/Gâ, vFâŻ/^Gâ, FâŻ/vG,
G, ^G/Aâ, vGâŻ/^Aâ, GâŻ/vA,
A, ^A/Bâ, vAâŻ/^Bâ, AâŻ/vB, B, C
The Pythagorean minor chord with 32/27 on C is still named Cm and still spelled CâEââG. But the 5-limit upminor chord uses the upminor 3rd 6/5 and is spelled Câ^EââG. This chord is named C^m. Compare with ^Cm (^Câ^Eââ^G).
The second, Quarter Tone Notation, uses half-sharps and half-flats instead of up and down arrows:
However, chords and some enharmonic equivalences are much different than they are in 12-EDO. For example, even though a 5-limit C minor triad is notated as CâEââG, C major triads are now CâE
âG instead of CâEâG, and an A minor triad is now AâC
âE even though an A major triad is still AâCâŻâE. Additionally, while major seconds such as CâD are divided as expected into 4 quarter tones, minor seconds such as EâF and BâC are 1 quarter tone, not 2. Thus E⯠is now equivalent to F
instead of F, Fâ is equivalent to E
instead of E, F is equivalent to E
, and E is equivalent to F
. Furthermore, the note a fifth above B is not the expected F⯠but rather F
or G
, and the note that is a fifth below F is now B
instead of Bâ.
The third, Porcupine Notation, introduces no new accidentals, but significantly changes chord spellings (e.g. the 5-limit major triad is now CâEâŻâGâŻ). In addition, enharmonic equivalences from 12-EDO are no longer valid. This yields the following chromatic scale:
C, CâŻ, Dâ,
D, DâŻ, Eâ,
E, EâŻ, Fâ,
F, FâŻ, Gâ,
G, GâŻ, G
/A
, Aâ,
A, AâŻ, Bâ,
B, BâŻ, Câ, C
Interval size
[edit]
The table below gives the sizes of some common intervals in 22 equal temperament. Intervals shown with a shaded backgroundâsuch as the septimal tritonesâare more than 1/4 of a step (approximately 13.6 cents) out of tune, when compared to the just ratios they approximate.
| Interval name | Size (steps) | Size (cents) | MIDI | Just ratio | Just (cents) | MIDI | Error (cents) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| octave
(2nd harmonic) |
22 | 1200 | 2:1 | 1200 | 0 | ||
| ultramajor seventh | 21 | 1145.45 | 27:14 | 1137.04 | +8.41 | ||
| major seventh
(15th harmonic) |
20 | 1090.91 | â | 15:8 | 1088.27 | â | +2.64 |
| neutral seventh | 19 | 1036.4 | 11:6 | 1049.4 | â13.0 | ||
| greater just minor seventh | 19 | 1036.4 | 9:5 | 1017.6 | +18.8 | ||
| lesser just minor seventh | 18 | 981.8 | 16:9 | 996.1 | â14.3 | ||
| septimal minor seventh
(7th harmonic) |
18 | 981.8 | 7:4 | 968.8 | +13.0 | ||
| septimal major sixth | 17 | 927.3 | 12:7 | 933.1 | â5.9 | ||
| major sixth | 16 | 872.7 | â | 5:3 | 884.4 | â | â11.6 |
| neutral sixth
(13th harmonic) |
15 | 818.2 | 13:8 | 840.5 | â22.3 | ||
| minor sixth | 15 | 818.2 | 8:5 | 813.7 | â | +4.5 | |
| undecimal minor sixth | 14 | 763.6 | 11:7 | 782.5 | â18.9 | ||
| septimal minor sixth | 14 | 763.6 | 14:9 | 764.9 | â1.3 | ||
| perfect fifth
(3rd harmonic) |
13 | 709.1 | â | 3:2 | 702.0 | â | +7.1 |
| undecimal semidiminished fifth | 12 | 654.55 | 16:11 | 648.68 | +5.87 | ||
| greater septimal tritone | 11 | 600 | 10:7 | 617.5 | â17.5 | ||
| lesser septimal tritone | 11 | 600 | 7:5 | 582.5 | â | +17.5 | |
| lesser undecimal tritone
(11th harmonic) |
10 | 545.5 | â | 11:8 | 551.3 | â | â5.9 |
| perfect fourth | 9 | 490.9 | â | 4:3 | 498.1 | â | â7.1 |
| septimal major third | 8 | 436.4 | 9:7 | 435.1 | â | +1.3 | |
| major third
(5th harmonic) |
7 | 381.8 | â | 5:4 | 386.3 | â | â4.5 |
| undecimal neutral third | 6 | 327.3 | 11:9 | 347.4 | â | â20.1 | |
| minor third | 6 | 327.3 | â | 6:5 | 315.6 | â | +11.6 |
| septimal minor third | 5 | 272.7 | 7:6 | 266.9 | â | +5.9 | |
| septimal whole tone | 4 | 218.2 | â | 8:7 | 231.2 | â | â13.0 |
| large just whole tone
(9th harmonic) |
4 | 218.2 | 9:8 | 203.9 | â | +14.3 | |
| small just whole tone | 3 | 163.6 | â | 10:9 | 182.4 | â | â18.8 |
| undecimal neutral second | 3 | 163.6 | 11:10 | 165.0 | â | â1.4 | |
| tridecimal diatonic semitone | 2 | 163.6 | 13:12 | 138.6 | +25.0 | ||
| septimal diatonic semitone | 2 | 109.1 | 15:14 | 119.4 | â | â10.4 | |
| diatonic semitone | 2 | 109.1 | â | 16:15 | 111.7 | â | â2.6 |
| minor diatonic semitone
(17th harmonic) |
2 | 109.1 | 17:16 | 105.0 | â | +4.1 | |
| septimal chromatic semitone | 2 | 109.1 | 21:20 | 84.5 | â | +24.6 | |
| just chromatic semitone | 1 | 54.6 | â | 25:24 | 70.7 | â | â16.1 |
| septimal quarter tone | 1 | 54.6 | 36:35 | 48.8 | â | +5.8 | |
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- â "22edo", on Xenharmonic Wiki. Accessed 1/27/2026.
- â Bosanquet, R.H.M. "On the Hindoo division of the octave, with additions to the theory of higher orders" (Archived[link removed] 2009-10-22), Proceedings of the Royal Society of London vol. 26 (March 1, 1877, to December 20, 1877) Taylor & Francis, London 1878, pp. 372â384. (Reproduced in Tagore, Sourindro Mohun, Hindu Music from Various Authors, Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series, Varanasi, India, 1965).
- â Barbour, James Murray, Tuning and temperament, a historical survey, East Lansing, Michigan State College Press, 1953 [c1951].
- â "Ups_and_downs_notation", on Xenharmonic Wiki. Accessed 2023â8â12.
External links
[edit]- 22edo on Xenharmonic Wiki
- Erlich, Paul, "Tuning, Tonality, and Twenty-Two Tone Temperament", William A. Sethares.
- Pachelbel's Canon in 22edo (MIDI), Herman Miller