Pewarta Proxy

📋 Server Request & Proxy Logs

Loading active proxy settings...
Developed by Khairul Adha (adhexa.id)
Mengambil log server...

⚙️ Pengaturan Proxy Target

Skip to content

Decommision support for 11, 12 and 18 databases. #1309

Closed

Description

@lwasylow

I think is time to decommision 11g builds and official support.

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]Decommision 11g support.[/-] [+]Decommision support for 11, 12 and 18 databases.[/+] on Mar 8, 2026
  2. jgebal commented on Mar 8, 2026

    @jgebal
    Member

    We should only keep 19 and above.
    !9c goes out of premier support in 1 month. Extended support ends in 1 year.

    https://www.itechtics.com/eol/oracle-database/

  3. jgebal commented on Mar 8, 2026

    @jgebal
    Member
    Image
  4. jgebal commented on Mar 8, 2026

    @jgebal
    Member

    I'm refreshing the github repo and b ringing the project back to stability now. I see that you also started to do the same.

  5. lwasylow commented on Mar 8, 2026

    @lwasylow
    MemberAuthor

    Yes @jgebal , almost there apart from 19c.
    I think looking on the images there was never 19c XE. I wonder if there is an issue with that image

  6. jgebal commented on Mar 8, 2026

    @jgebal
    Member

    We always had our own DB builds images long before Docker was a thing that everyone had.
    So we have our own images created.
    For some reason, the 19c image that we have is not working well.
    Maybe I need to rebuild it.
    There is some strange issue with connecting to that image.
    I can reproduce it locally.

    Connections work well when I connect from my local Windows.
    When I use Ubuntu 24 on Windows (WSL) , I get the same error as we see in pipeline.
    When doing the same thing with Oracle 23 image - all works fine.

  7. jgebal commented on Mar 8, 2026

    @jgebal
    Member

    Well. I reported the problem with Oracle 23 image to Gerald - related to some non-deterministic error.
    The other problem with our own 19c Image should now be resolved with this commit

  8. lwasylow commented on Mar 8, 2026

    @lwasylow
    MemberAuthor

    Nice I will pull the changes to bring my branch up to date.

  9. jgebal commented on Mar 8, 2026

    @jgebal
    Member

    I think I have solved the problem with 19c.
    At least the tests are now running 🤞

    https://github.com/utPLSQL/utPLSQL/actions/runs/22830170857/job/66216998893
    The problem was with how the sqlnet.ora was configured in the container. Similar to issue that existed in 21-XE.
    gvenzl/oci-oracle-xe#43

  10. lwasylow commented on Mar 8, 2026

    @lwasylow
    MemberAuthor

    Nice.
    For 21 and 23 we can switch also to slim faststart versions.

  11. lwasylow commented on Mar 8, 2026

    @lwasylow
    MemberAuthor

    @jgebal

    Well. I reported the problem with Oracle 23 image to Gerald - related to some non-deterministic error. The other problem with our own 19c Image should now be resolved with this commit

    I did some digging a little bit and turn out that on 23 error was due to our code.
    On Oracle 23free, treat(a_event_item as ut_run) is triggering ORA-21779 because a_event_item is passed as IN (not IN OUT NOCOPY), and 23c is stricter about object durations when casting/treating objects passed by value.

    I have put a PR there with a fix as well as the switch to fast start.

  12. jgebal commented on Mar 9, 2026

    @jgebal
    Member

    We need to review the list of supported DB versions.

    We should also remove conditional compilation that references versions < 19.
    That should make installation a bit more clean.

  13. lwasylow commented on Mar 9, 2026

    @lwasylow
    MemberAuthor

    In that case we should bump the major.
    While I think stop <19 builds and new features or bugs is good, removing conditional compilation might be a breaking change.
    I'm up for it just I think it has to be a very clear distinction.

  14. jgebal commented on Mar 9, 2026

    @jgebal
    Member

    I did some digging a little bit and turn out that on 23 error was due to our code. On Oracle 23free, treat(a_event_item as ut_run) is triggering ORA-21779 because a_event_item is passed as IN (not IN OUT NOCOPY), and 23c is stricter about object durations when casting/treating objects passed by value.

    I have put a PR there with a fix as well as the switch to fast start.

    Can you share what you found (sites/pages)? I would like to learn a bit more about this "improvement"

  15. locked and limited conversation to collaborators on May 9, 2026
  16. converted this issue into a discussion #1346 on May 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions