Repository navigation
TC39 Proposal Temporal #498
Description
Request for Mozilla Position on an Emerging Web Specification
- Specification Title: TC39 Proposal Temporal
- Specification or proposal URL: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal
- Caniuse.com URL (optional): N/A
- Bugzilla URL (optional): https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1519167
- Mozillians who can provide input (optional): N/A
Activity
annevk commentedon Mar 11, 2021
Any particular reason you are wondering about Mozilla's position here?
As a general rule, we'd object to entering Stage 1/2/3 if we would not be okay with a TC39 proposal. There might well be an exception to that rule if we missed a meeting or some such or overlooked an important issue, but I would expect that to be rather exceptional.
Jxck commentedon Mar 12, 2021
IIUC, mozilla has a choice not to implement even if its on Stage 4.
And explicit position on MSP will help developer who interested in Key features like Temporal but not familiar with tc39 meeting/standardization process.
annevk commentedon Mar 12, 2021
standards-positions is not about product priorities. So even if we take an explicit position here (and to be clear, this specific thing is worth prototyping), that doesn't mean it will be implemented anytime soon.
Jxck commentedon Mar 12, 2021
Jxck commentedon Apr 4, 2021
FYI for @annevk
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/pzy_Z3AwmaY/m/FeXzN3hnAwAJ
annevk commentedon Apr 12, 2021
Yeah, I think that is fine. Closing this as worth prototyping.
captainbrosset commentedon Dec 20, 2024
There seems to be some movement in the implementation of Temporal in Firefox. Should this be marked as
position:positivethen? @zcorpan?